Latest News

1. Yet, for the genealogy and family history, all of us knowthat for each and every code there was an exemption. A good vexing area ofgenealogy is the fact nobody most knows exactly how to put on the fresh conditions orrules which have one definitive adjective like always, maybe, probably,almost certainly, etcetera. It might be interesting in the event that there other instances ofjointures getting produced per year or a couple of immediately after a well-known relationship day.

dos. Can there be a keen extant dispensation into relationship out-of ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who were third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, immediately following taken off the fresh new 5th LordClifford? Who restrict their wedding date.

Arthur

Allegedly, if a beneficial dispensation is actually sought and you will supplied, it can havebeen because of the among the many following, that will appear in new correspondingregister book, if this endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop regarding Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop from Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop from Carlisle 1509-1520

5. When your 10th Lord Clifford really does get married during the early 1487 [state January] andhas E after for the reason that year, really does new chronology perhaps not really works?

John fingers?

Elizabeth born in the later 1487, Henry created in the 1488/nine, Joan in ,etcetera. completing the names of publish from . When the (a) thechronology however functions; and you can (b) their own marriage piece wasn’t reduced; thenwe simply have the newest 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s which is for the oppositionto this new supposition one to she are a valid child.

six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters brand new onlyknown Henry VII relationships omitted? Have there been other people? In that case,won’t that reflect badly on this document once the a source?

Away from evaluations I have made from the new c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith the 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s North pedigrees, that are

On the c.1505 Connections pedigrees, the latest Clifford children are perhaps not listedin an effective Clifford pedigree, but alternatively regarding the St. John pedigree. As I’mnot regularly the latest St. John family relations, adopting the is the pointers asit seems about c.1505 pedigree, once the taken from the newest 1834 Coll. Top. etGen. blog post. This new phrasing for the quotations is exactly because it seems inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Of my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, Rancho Cucamonga, CA women most beautiful dating 318.”Margaret Duchess of Somerset got about three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My personal Lady the new King’s Mommy.” who’d “The fresh new Queen.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first husband.” she had 3 daus & dos sons:

An excellent. “Edith, married to Geoffrey Rod out of Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded to your Lady Margaret, dau. from theDuke away from Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[another type of child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. off Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun away from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and you can sistren.” Which have issueindicated, however called.C2. “E, wedded in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Age, married basic towards Lord Zouche; after into LordScrope off Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated yet not called.

Margaret Duchess off Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Elizabeth.”